kkarhan
@kkarhan@jorts.horse
jorts.horse
@theregister@geeknews.chat @lproven@social.vivaldi.net I think that is bad and @linuxfoundation@social.lfx.dev should not have caved in on said pressure but stricly banned #AIslop contributions and treated it like they treated malicious contributions the same way #Valve deals with #Cheaters!
Plus the removal of #i486 support is IMHO bad because it was fine and shpuld've been left in.And I'm not just complaining because I maintain a #minimalist distro (@OS1337@infosec.space) that targets i486 (SX), like #Vortex86…
0
0
0
kkarhan
@kkarhan@jorts.horse
jorts.horse
@kernellogger@hachyderm.io also did #i486 support really get axed?
0
1
0
kkarhan
@kkarhan@jorts.horse
jorts.horse
@pertho@mastodon.bsd.cafe @rootwyrm@weird.autos yes and if the sole reason for @OS1337@infosec.space was to use dd & ddrescue on some industrial thingy that runs #MSDOS then yeah that would be fine.
I just think that yeeting i486 is wrong cuz #i486 requires way less workarounds than #i386 to work wellCuz yes there are still new machines deployed with i486-only #CPU|s / #SoC|s in #industrial setups!
0
1
0
OS/1337
@OS1337@infosec.space
A minimalist musl + toybox/Linux Distribution focussed on being the bare minimum of a useable desktop whilst making most of the space it does. like/star ≠ endorsement, but acknowledgement of being read.
infosec.space
@rootwyrm@weird.autos Worse even: #Linux planning to kill #i486SX / #i486 support is a huge blow.to #embedded & #industrial systems!
3
1
2
You've seen all posts